Introduction:

After a recent interaction with the Bing chatbot, one reporter  described it as “a moody, manic-depressive teenager who has been trapped,  against its will, inside a second-rate search engine.” Later, the reporter  explained how the chatbot described its dark fantasies, professed its love for  him, and tried to convince him he was unhappy in his marriage. We, of  course, have heard how artificial intelligence is coming for us. How it can already create award-winning paintings, write poetry, and, of course, do  many of the tasks that humans are currently doing. This includes law. When  tested by Professors at the University of Minnesota Law School, ChatGPT  passed, leading commentators to ask whether it could also be a decent  lawyer. As “word merchants,” lawyers have long been seen as at risk from  the growth of AI. In this article, we explain how the narrative of AI’s ability  to make legal decisions is wrong.    

. . .

Details: